Add a comment

Socially-distanced rehearsing

One of the responses to my recent post On Singing Solo Safely talked about how the rehearsal protocols we need for live rehearsing also affect the sense of safety singers experience in rehearsal:

Singing in masks and socially distanced is another example where the safety of the wall of sound disappears and singers can often only hear themselves.

To which I’d add singing outside and in smaller groups as other things that dilute the sonic envelope around us. Indeed, of all of these, singing in masks is the least of our problems; they may feel like they symbolically gag us, but their effects on the music are minimal compared to the effects of the inverse-square law of sound.

One of the mantras of the covid era has been ‘you wouldn’t choose to do it this way, but it’s better than not doing it at all’. But this comment brought into focus for me the fact that, yes, actually would and indeed have chosen to do some of these things back in our days of normal live rehearsing.

Empirical studies of choral stacking have consistently found that spacing singers out improves the sound both for listeners and for the singers themselves. Our requirements for social distancing probably add more space than would provide an optimum self-to-other ratio (especially in outdoor scenarios), but it might be closer to that optimum than we might normally choose when squishing people in together too closely.

Singing outside is not only something that choirs often find themselves doing in performance situations, but it is also a well-established rehearsal method for learning to cope with difficult acoustics. If you always rehearse in a lively space, it can be very unnerving if you come to a performance and find that the sound disappears and you feel like you’re singing alone. Rehearsing outside gives you the opportunity to adapt to these kinds of conditions, and thus the confidence that you have the skills and experience to cope with them in a performance condition.

(Tangentially, some of the sense of ‘only hearing yourself’ may often arise from the performance situation itself rather than the acoustics: tunnel hearing is a known adrenaline response. The outside rehearsal helps both in providing the skills to cope with it, and, by increasing your confidence, also moderates the adrenal kick.)

Likewise, singing in smaller groups than usual is great rehearsal tool for getting people to raise their game. People have to step up and take more individual responsibility for creating the sound, rather than just relaxing back into it. The choral tone when you put two semi-choruses who have sung separately back together is far richer than the composite you had before the separation.

These methods for stretching a choir to develop specific skills are the kind of thing that Daniel Coyle refers to as ‘practice gadgets’. They’re like a snooker player deciding to play every shot with a rest for a week, or a pianist following CPE Bach’s advice and playing familiar pieces in the dark. They make things harder in particular dimensions so that, under normal circumstances, the skills are greater than required to achieve the goal.

To be sure, we probably wouldn’t choose to do all of these practice gadgets at once in a regular rehearsal. Educationally, you’d want to stretch in one dimension at a time to focus the skill development in that particular area.

But, given that we need these various measures all at once for risk mitigation purposes, we may as well embrace them as part of the process. Enhanced listening, good resonance and legato, and the ability to project rather than push the voice are not only essential to make outdoor, distanced, small-group singing work effectively, they will also be of great value when we can rehearse indoors all together again. It helps us cope with the current difficult rehearsal protocols when we know that our future selves will reap benefits that have been specifically generated by those protocols.